About Us
Welcome to MCLabs! The longest running farming server & pioneers of the gamemode
Server Store
Store
play.labs-mc.com
0 PLAYERS ONLINE
Join Our Discord!
0 MEMBERS ONLINE
Lurnn VS Posix
- Thread starter Lurrn
- Start date
- Status
StopTakingUsernames
Well-Known Member
I have a kit idea - nothing.
StopTakingUsernames
Well-Known Member
It would be interesting if it was a monthly occurrence. Maybe have some preset potion kits so players can pick and choose their strongest one.
I missed the event, posix didn't tell me because he was too scared.
A. I don't know if my view reflects that of others, but I personally prefer nodebuff to debuff pvp and think pvp should be nodebuff.
I. Debuffs tend to polarize matches because the balance of a fight heavily shifts towards a player's favor if they manage to land a lucky debuff. This would result in a lower skill player having a higher chance to win.
B. Player-selected kits would be nice if possible, though it may be harder to implement because people would take longer to select kits they have to hand-build. Alternatively, multiple kits could be created with different loadouts to meet the preferences of certain players.
I. Regeneration potions were not in the kit. Regen potions are usually used in potpvp so I feel this was an oversight, but I may also be a whiny crybaby loser.
II. The kit used splash effect potions. Drinkable potions could be added as an alternative to players who desire more consistency, as splash effect potions give variable amounts of utility and decrease the time players can spend potted.
C. The arena was pretty awkward. Having a diagonal half ellipse arena is pretty annoying when using splash potions.
D. The kit was missing potions and was 2 items away from filling an inventory. This seems like an obvious flaw.
Last edited:
The arena was changed on the fly to ensure the event wouldn't have taken three hours, we plan on building a new arena with better viewing angles and improved fighting bounds.
We plan on running these events semi-regularly, we are unsure if we want to create a single kit and use it every time, or theme each event.
Although, most of the event team believes that if there is a kit, where the contents of the kit are previously announced - it is irrelevant what is in it, as long as players have time to prepare, the best player will win. We will be announcing what ever kit we are planning on using for the event, at least one week prior, giving players enough time to familiarize themselves with the items, and how they play together.
Thank you for your feedback, it was useful, contrustive almost.
StopTakingUsernames
Well-Known Member
Just because p0six is dumb docent mean he's blind. He can still see that insulting sentence and his feelings are now likely hurt.
Edit: I don't even know why you are calling me dumb when you didn't use commas correctly in that ban appeal... yikes
Edit: I don't even know why you are calling me dumb when you didn't use commas correctly in that ban appeal... yikes
Last edited:
I. it can be argued that landing a debuff takes skill and your lack of it is what makes you dislike it? ( its also because your bad with splashes )
And you being bad with splashes is the same reason you want drinkables - when it comes to the regen potions i dont see how you were at a disadvantage with them not being there as NOONE had them and the kit was meant to have 1 extra strength pot i don't know where they went wrong there
Basically what im trying to say was your complaints were mostly selfish and you wanted more based around the way you liked it even though you were the only person at the event who complained AND you only complained AFTER you lost so.
But on the arena part i agree with you posix
And you being bad with splashes is the same reason you want drinkables - when it comes to the regen potions i dont see how you were at a disadvantage with them not being there as NOONE had them and the kit was meant to have 1 extra strength pot i don't know where they went wrong there
Basically what im trying to say was your complaints were mostly selfish and you wanted more based around the way you liked it even though you were the only person at the event who complained AND you only complained AFTER you lost so.
But on the arena part i agree with you posix
Last edited:
Lurnn, I’m arguing to diversify options to accommodate more players. Nothing you’ve said here is really relevant. Also, it is objectively wrong to say I wasn’t at a disadvantage for having no regen given that I’m bad at potting. This isn’t my way of arguing that the results should be nullified, I just want to make pvp tournaments better in the future.
on debuffs: I talked to 36s and a couple of other people and they both insisted they couldn’t find anyone who wanted debuffs. I know sirpenguin doesn’t like debuffs, and I know I don’t. This being said, it’s unfair to say I’m engaged in motivated reasoning to remove debuffs for self benefit
Last edited:
I clearly do not understand, and I'm not being facetious here. How were you "objectively" at a disadvantage to any other player?
I was objectively at a disadvantage relative to if there were regen potions.
That wasn’t what Lurnn was arguing, so saying that he was “objectively wrong” is...objectively wrong.
lurnn doesn’t get to pick what he’s arguing if he’s arguing that I’m not disadvantaged after I claim I was. If one of us has been arguing the wrong thing, then it’s his fault.
Suppose it wasn't any issue unless you won right?
I love feedback for this event as it'll help the next one run smoother and overall a better experience for players despite this the fact you didn't raise that you felt at all disadvantaged in the 6 days before the event nor did you complain about the pots in any of the events you won but the second you lost you claim you're at a disadvantage comes across very poor taste and questions if its feedback to improve the event or improve your chances of winning.
- Status
Members online
No members online now.